NFL Draft 2017: Ranking Jets' best QB options, including Mitch Trubisky

By Darryl Slater | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com

Even though the Jets just signed Josh McCown and also have Christian Hackenberg and Bryce Petty on their roster, they could still select a quarterback in the 2017 NFL Draft. Let's rank their options (from worst to best), including Mitch Trubisky, Deshaun Watson, and DeShone Kizer. There is a strong possibility all of these quarterbacks will be available for the Jets when they draft at No. 6.

Don't Edit

AP Photo

Brad Kaaya, Miami

Unlikely. But the Jets would be able to get him in Round 3 or 4, if they really wanted to do that. It would be a curious move, considering they just took Hackenberg in Round 2 last year. Kaaya is far from a sure thing.

Don't Edit

Brad Kaaya's 2016 stats

3,532 yards

27 touchdowns

7 interceptions

Don't Edit

Brad Kaaya's scouting report

From NFL.com: "Groomed to be a quarterback from an early age, Kaaya flashes the mechanics and intelligence of a player who has spent hours in quarterback camps. However, he can be too mechanical and thinks too much rather than just flowing and responding to what the field offers him. Kaaya could have used another year of college, but he has the tools and intangibles to become an NFL starter. While he can work around his average arm strength, he must improve his accuracy and anticipation if he is to make a mark in the NFL."

Don't Edit

via YouTube

Brad Kaaya's film

Don't Edit
Don't Edit

AP Photo

Nathan Peterman, Pittsburgh

Another mid-round possibility. Don't bet on it. He has good size, at 226 pounds. He probably just isn't a good enough prospect in a year with a weak quarterback pool of draft prospects.

Don't Edit

Nathan Peterman's 2016 stats

2,855 yards

27 touchdowns

7 interceptions

Don't Edit

Nathan Peterman's scouting report

From NFL.com: "Peterman's experience in a pro-style passing attack gives him a head start headed into the league. His physical attributes are just average, but his accuracy, composure and anticipation are what sets him apart from some of the more physically gifted quarterbacks in this year's draft. Peterman's tape is sure to catch the eye of at least a few teams in need of a quarterback and he should come off the board by day two with a chance to become a solid starting quarterback in the future."

Don't Edit

via YouTube

Nathan Peterman's film

Don't Edit

AP Photo

Davis Webb, California

The concern with him: Is he just a system guy? He has the physical tools (6-foot-5, 229 pounds), but how will he adjust to an NFL offense? Those questions are why he is projected to go in Round 2 or 3.

Don't Edit
Don't Edit

Davis Webb's 2016 stats

4,295 yards

37 touchdowns

12 interceptions

Don't Edit

Davis Webb's scouting report

From NFL.com: "System quarterback with more than 65 percent of his attempts coming inside of 10 yards. Webb has enough raw talent to be considered a developmental prospect, but his decision-making and accuracy issues beyond 10 yards is a big red flag that might be tough to overcome in the NFL."

Don't Edit

via YouTube

Davis Webb's film

Don't Edit

AP Photo

Patrick Mahomes II, Texas Tech

Fascinating prospect. Put up monster numbers, but no quarterback has successfully transitioned from the Air Raid-style offense that Texas Tech runs to the NFL. He is projected as a late first-round or second-round pick. The Jets could take a shot at him if they trade back in the first round. It would be a risk.

Don't Edit

Patrick Mahomes' 2016 stats

5,052 yards

41 touchdowns

10 interceptions

Don't Edit
Don't Edit

Patrick Mahomes' scouting report

From NFL.com: "Mahomes is a big, confident quarterback who brings a variety of physical tools to the party, but he's developed some bad habits and doesn't have a very repeatable process as a passer. Mahomes' ability to improvise and extend plays can lead to big plays for his offense, but he will have to prove he can operate with better anticipation and be willing to take what the defense gives him in order to win from the pocket. Mahomes will be a work in progress, but he's a high ceiling, low floor prospect."

Don't Edit

via YouTube

Patrick Mahomes' film

Don't Edit

AP Photo

DeShone Kizer, Notre Dame

His draft stock has fallen lately, as he didn't exactly excel at the NFL Scouting Combine. Some analysts believe he will fall out of the first round entirely. Do the Jets really want to take a guy with this many question marks, especially at No. 6? They surely wouldn't take him there, would they?

Don't Edit

DeShone Kizer's 2016 stats

2,925 yards

26 touchdowns

9 interceptions

Don't Edit

DeShone Kizer's scouting report

From NFL.com: "The comparison to Steve McNair could raise eyebrows, but that is based primarily on size, mobility and arm strength. The aforementioned traits often land a quarterback in the first round, but Kizer's second-half drop in production combined with inconsistent decision-making and accuracy should be a speed bump for teams ready to jump in head-first on the traits. Kizer has the ability to become a quality starter, but has to improve his ball placement and field vision first."

Don't Edit
Don't Edit

via YouTube

DeShone Kizer's film

Don't Edit

Follow along

Don't Edit

AP Photo

Deshaun Watson, Clemson

Since it looks like none of the first five teams this year will draft a quarterback, Watson and Mitch Trubisky are probably going to be the Jets' best options at No. 6. Nobody would blame the Jets if they took either player there. Watson was a winner throughout his time at Clemson, and just won a national title.

Don't Edit

Deshaun Watson's 2016 stats

4,593 yards

41 touchdowns

17 interceptions

Don't Edit

Deshaun Watson's scouting report

From NFL.com: "Teams will have to weigh the inconsistent field vision and decision-making against his size, athleticism, leadership and production. While not perfect, teams can add checks to both arm and accuracy boxes for Watson. However, discussions about whether or not his areas of improvement can be corrected will likely determine whether a team will view him as a high-upside prospect or a franchise quarterback. Watson's transition from Clemson's offense to a pro-style attack will obviously take time, but his combination of intangibles and athletic ability make him worth a first-round selection."

Don't Edit
Don't Edit

via YouTube

Deshaun Watson's film

Don't Edit

Vote here

Don't Edit

AP Photo

Mitch Trubisky, North Carolina

It's probably a toss-up between Watson and Trubisky for this year's best quarterback prospect. Again, there are no sure-thing franchise quarterbacks in this draft. The issue with Trubisky is he really has just one year of starting experience. But he is a prototypical pocket passer for the NFL, in terms of his build and assets. The Jets are evaluating him. Presuming he is there for them at No. 6, would they select him?

Don't Edit

Mitch Trubisky's 2016 stats

3,748 yards

30 touchdowns

6 interceptions

Don't Edit

Mitch Trubisky's scouting report

From NFL.com: "Trubisky is a high-end quarterback prospect who possesses NFL size, a big arm and the ability to throw with accuracy from the pocket or on the move. Despite playing in a spread-based offense, he's a full-field reader who does a very good job of getting an early read on the safeties before crafting his course of action. Trubisky will have to become much more pocket aware and do a better job of recognizing and attacking blitzes to back NFL defensive coordinators off. He hasn't put all the pieces together yet, but the puzzle is all right in front. Trubisky projects as a good starting quarterback with a high floor and the potential to be great."

Don't Edit
Don't Edit

via YouTube

Mitch Trubisky's film

Don't Edit

Darryl Slater may be reached at dslater@njadvancemedia.com. Follow him on Twitter @DarrylSlater. Find NJ.com Jets on Facebook.

Don't Edit